Différences entre les versions de « Kandybowicz (2008:37) »

De Arbres
(Remplacement de texte — « colspan="4" | » par « colspan="10" | »)
Ligne 13 : Ligne 13 :
| || || ||Musa|| cut || meat || ni || FOC
| || || ||Musa|| cut || meat || ni || FOC
|-
|-
|||||||colspan="4" | 'Musa actually cut the meat.'  
|||||||colspan="10" | 'Musa actually cut the meat.'  
| ||b.||*|| Musa|| ba ||nakàn ||'''o'''|| '''ni:'''.  
| ||b.||*|| Musa|| ba ||nakàn ||'''o'''|| '''ni:'''.  
|-
|-
Ligne 34 : Ligne 34 :
| ||Musa|| cut || meat || ni  
| ||Musa|| cut || meat || ni  
|-
|-
|||colspan="4" | 'Musa actually cut the meat.'  
|||colspan="10" | 'Musa actually cut the meat.'  
|}
|}


Ligne 47 : Ligne 47 :
|||Musa|| cut || meat || NEG || ni  
|||Musa|| cut || meat || NEG || ni  
|-
|-
|||colspan="4" | 'Musa did not actually cut the meat.'  
|||colspan="10" | 'Musa did not actually cut the meat.'  
|}
|}



Version du 7 mars 2022 à 11:19

Kandybowicz établit que la paritule ni: en nupe est une particule de focus:

 "ni: patterns like the focus marker o; it occupies a high position in the left periphery, 
 appears clause finally, and follows negation [...]. 
 Additionally, ni: sentences have polarity focus interpretations, making them amenable to 
 analysis in terms of Foc°. 
 Furthermore, the morphemes ni: and o stand in complementary distribution, as seen below."


(24) a. * Musa ba nakàn ni: o.
Musa cut meat ni FOC
'Musa actually cut the meat.' b. * Musa ba nakàn o ni:.
Musa cut meat FOC ni


Or, cette particule de focus ni:, contrairement à la particule bez en breton, est compatible avec la négation:


 "[...] the morpheme ni:, whose semantic contribution is to reinforce the polarity 
 of the clause/add emphasis to the asserted truth or falsity of the sentence. 
 The distribution of ni: is similar to the distribution of negation; 
 both appear clause-finally."


(22) Musa ba nakàn ni:.
Musa cut meat ni
'Musa actually cut the meat.'
 "[...] ni: and negation are able to co-occur, suggesting that they do not compete 
 for the same syntactic position. That is, the two morphemes are not in 
 complementary distribution, as shown below:"


(23) Musa ba nakàn à ni:.
Musa cut meat NEG ni
'Musa did not actually cut the meat.'


Référence

  • Kandybowicz, J. 2008. The Grammar of Repetition, Nupe grammar at the syntax-phonology interface, John Benjamins Publishing Company.