Différences entre les versions de « Wmffre (1998:19,20) »
De Arbres
(Nouvelle page : '''2.8 negation''' Nouns can be emphatically negated by the negative adjective '''(e')bet''' 'at all', e.g., (36) '''n ø.s (ke) b~ɑŋk bed ba ke:ɣ''' 'there is no bank in town...) |
|||
Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
'''2.8 negation''' | '''2.8 negation''' | ||
Nouns can be emphatically negated by the negative adjective '''(e')bet''' 'at all', e.g., | Nouns can be emphatically negated by the negative adjective '''(e')bet''' 'at all', e.g., | ||
(36) '''n ø.s (ke) b~ɑŋk bed ba ke:ɣ''' 'there is no bank in town' | (36) '''n ø.s (ke) b~ɑŋk bed ba ke:ɣ''' 'there is no bank in town' | ||
The post-positioned negative verbal particle '''ke(d)''' can be dispensed with when '''(e')bet''' is also present in the same sentence, and is usually not found in a phrase such as '''n ø.s d~ɛn e'bet ~ɑm<sup>ə</sup>''' 'there is nobody here'; though the addition of '''ke(t)'''would be quite acceptable. | The post-positioned negative verbal particle '''ke(d)''' can be dispensed with when '''(e')bet''' is also present in the same sentence, and is usually not found in a phrase such as '''n ø.s d~ɛn e'bet ~ɑm<sup>ə</sup>''' 'there is nobody here'; though the addition of '''ke(t)'''would be quite acceptable. |
Version du 17 janvier 2009 à 14:23
2.8 negation
Nouns can be emphatically negated by the negative adjective (e')bet 'at all', e.g.,
(36) n ø.s (ke) b~ɑŋk bed ba ke:ɣ 'there is no bank in town'
The post-positioned negative verbal particle ke(d) can be dispensed with when (e')bet is also present in the same sentence, and is usually not found in a phrase such as n ø.s d~ɛn e'bet ~ɑmə 'there is nobody here'; though the addition of ke(t)would be quite acceptable.