Jouitteau (2015b)

De Arbres
Révision datée du 24 janvier 2015 à 08:48 par Mjouitteau (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Jouitteau, M. à paraître, 'Free choice and reduplication, a study of Breton dependent indefinites', Tomasz Czerniak, Maciej Czerniakowski and Krzysztof Jaskuła (éds.),... »)
(diff) ← Version précédente | Voir la version actuelle (diff) | Version suivante → (diff)

Jouitteau, M. à paraître, 'Free choice and reduplication, a study of Breton dependent indefinites', Tomasz Czerniak, Maciej Czerniakowski and Krzysztof Jaskuła (éds.), Representations and Interpretations in Celtic Studies, Lublin.


abstract

 Indefinites are felicitous with a reading where, internally to a contextually relevant set, the particular choice of referent is irrelevant. When a magician says Pick a card, context favors an interpretation where any card from the set would be a felicitous choice, as long as it is a card from the proposed set, as illustrated for modern Breton (Continental Celtic) in (1)a. Some indefinite constructions have this free-choice reading as the only felicitous one. This paper closely investigates such a free choice indefinite (FCI) that presents a typologically unusual morphology as illustrated in (1)b. 
 This free-choice indefinite is realized by reduplication of the head noun around what seems like a spatial proximate deictic morpheme (-mañ-). The relevant contrast with the regular indefinite ur gartenn in (1)a is loss of optionality for the free-choice reading. The sentence in (1)a is felicitous if the magician proposes only one card,  whereas (1)b is not.


(1) DURING A SHOW, THE MAGICIAN SAYS:

     a. Trapit ur gartenn		   

Pick a card ‘Pick a card.’

     b. Trapit kartenn-mañ-kartenn. 
        pick    card-here-card 
       ‘Pick a card, any card.’		Breton
 In this paper, I will first investigate the DP-internal syntax and morphology of the reduplication construction in (1)b. I will propose that it results from the creation of a complex head noun by reduplication in a morphological step operated between syntax and phonological form. Next, I investigate the distribution of the Breton reduplicated FCI. I show that when preceded by a specificity marker, this construction behaves like a regular indefinite. When not preceded by this specificity marker, the noun exhibits the typical distributional restrictions of dependent indefinites. I will show that the bare use has existential quantificational force, but can acquire universal force when bound by a universal quantifier.