Différences entre les versions de « Discussion:Gwall- »
De Arbres
Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
Another apparently prefixed adverb that does not seem to lenite is bras (intensifieur): ur vro bras-ec'hon (G). | --[[Utilisateur:Wade|Wade]] ([[Discussion utilisateur:Wade|discussion]]) 1 août 2016 à 14:57 (CEST): Another apparently prefixed adverb that does not seem to lenite is bras (intensifieur): ur vro bras-ec'hon (G). | ||
Cf. optional (not obligatory, as apparently above) nonlenition for adjectives in coordination: ur gazeg bihan ha glas, ur waremm gouez, kompez (Press) or with a complement, etc (Press, Favereau). It seems that intensifiers are among the factors that block lenition: un vro bras-meurbet, un dra bras-abominapl, ur vougev bras-kenan (G), where the SUFFIX intensifier prevents the adjective from leniting. In fact Favereau p. 152-3 explicitly gives this for un dra mat-tre &c. | Cf. optional (not obligatory, as apparently above) nonlenition for adjectives in coordination: ur gazeg bihan ha glas, ur waremm gouez, kompez (Press) or with a complement, etc (Press, Favereau). It seems that intensifiers are among the factors that block lenition: un vro bras-meurbet, un dra bras-abominapl, ur vougev bras-kenan (G), where the SUFFIX intensifier prevents the adjective from leniting. In fact Favereau p. 152-3 explicitly gives this for un dra mat-tre &c. |
Version du 1 août 2016 à 14:57
--Wade (discussion) 1 août 2016 à 14:57 (CEST): Another apparently prefixed adverb that does not seem to lenite is bras (intensifieur): ur vro bras-ec'hon (G).
Cf. optional (not obligatory, as apparently above) nonlenition for adjectives in coordination: ur gazeg bihan ha glas, ur waremm gouez, kompez (Press) or with a complement, etc (Press, Favereau). It seems that intensifiers are among the factors that block lenition: un vro bras-meurbet, un dra bras-abominapl, ur vougev bras-kenan (G), where the SUFFIX intensifier prevents the adjective from leniting. In fact Favereau p. 152-3 explicitly gives this for un dra mat-tre &c.