Différences entre les versions de « Bury (2010) »
De Arbres
(Page créée avec « * Bury, Dirk. 2010. 'Verb-second, particles, and flexible verb-initial orders', Mélanie Jouitteau (éd.), ''Lingua'' 120, 303-314. '''Abstract''': "This paper focuses on the analysis of languages that allow both VSO and VOS orders. An analysis is proposed in the context of a flexible approach to syntax (cf. Neeleman, A., Weerman, F. 1999. Flexible Syntax: A Theory of Ccase and Arguments. Kluwer, Dordrecht) and compared with different alternative analyses of V... ») |
|||
| Ligne 3 : | Ligne 3 : | ||
'''Abstract''': | '''Abstract''': | ||
"This paper focuses on the analysis of languages that allow both VSO and VOS orders. | "This paper focuses on the analysis of languages that allow both [[VSO]] and VOS orders. An analysis is proposed in the context of a flexible approach to syntax (cf. [[Neeleman & Weerman (1999)|Neeleman & Weerman 1999]]) and compared with different alternative analyses of VSO-VOS alternations. The major argument is that a flexible approach allows for an analysis of VSO-VOS alternation that is appealing because of its simplicity and because of a number of predictions. The most important predictions are that languages with VSO-VOS alternation should have preverbal particles and that the subject should c-command the object in both VSO and VOS clauses. It is argued that three VSO-VOS languages (St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish), Chamorro and Tongan) conform to these predictions." | ||
An analysis is proposed in the context of a flexible approach to syntax (cf. Neeleman | |||
The major argument is that a flexible approach allows for an analysis of VSO-VOS | |||
alternation that is appealing because of its simplicity and because of a number of | |||
predictions. The most important predictions are that languages with VSO-VOS | |||
alternation should have preverbal particles and that the subject should c-command the | |||
object in both VSO and VOS clauses. It is argued that three VSO-VOS languages | |||
(St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish), Chamorro and Tongan) conform to these predictions." | |||
Version actuelle datée du 14 décembre 2022 à 13:26
- Bury, Dirk. 2010. 'Verb-second, particles, and flexible verb-initial orders', Mélanie Jouitteau (éd.), Lingua 120, 303-314.
Abstract: "This paper focuses on the analysis of languages that allow both VSO and VOS orders. An analysis is proposed in the context of a flexible approach to syntax (cf. Neeleman & Weerman 1999) and compared with different alternative analyses of VSO-VOS alternations. The major argument is that a flexible approach allows for an analysis of VSO-VOS alternation that is appealing because of its simplicity and because of a number of predictions. The most important predictions are that languages with VSO-VOS alternation should have preverbal particles and that the subject should c-command the object in both VSO and VOS clauses. It is argued that three VSO-VOS languages (St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish), Chamorro and Tongan) conform to these predictions."
Mots-clefs: VSO, VOS, verb-second, flexible word order, verb movement, re-projection
linearisation, verb-initial languages, preverbal particles, Tongan, Chamorro, St'át'imcets
(Lillooet Salish)
