Différences entre les versions de « Bjorkman (2011) »
De Arbres
(Page créée avec « * Bjorkman, M. Bronwyn. 2011. ''BE-ing Default: the Morphosyntax of Auxiliaries'', PhD thesis, MIT. [https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001354 texte]. '''Introduction au ch... ») |
|||
| Ligne 4 : | Ligne 4 : | ||
'''Introduction au chapitre 4''': | '''Introduction au chapitre 4''': | ||
"Chapter 4 investigates the use of ''do'' as a “support” auxiliary not only in English but in the mainland Scandinavian languages, the Northern Italian dialect Monnese, and Breton. | "Chapter 4 investigates the use of ''do'' as a “support” auxiliary not only in English but in the mainland Scandinavian languages, the Northern Italian dialect Monnese, and Breton. | ||
The motivation for this investigation is the potential conflict between the analysis of ''be'' advanced in chapter 2 and traditional analyses of ''do''-support: both involve the “last resort” insertion of a default verb in order to morphologically realize stranded inflectional information. I demonstrate that the typological profile of ''do''-support is incompatible with its traditional analysis, and sketch an alternative analysis in which do is not inserted as a rescue verb of some kind, but instead realizes an instance of v<sup>0</sup> that is linearized non-adjacent to the [[lexical]] verb." | The motivation for this investigation is the potential conflict between the analysis of ''be'' advanced in chapter 2 and traditional analyses of ''do''-support: both involve the “last resort” insertion of a default verb in order to morphologically realize stranded inflectional information. I demonstrate that the typological profile of ''do''-support is incompatible with its traditional analysis, and sketch an alternative analysis in which ''do'' is not inserted as a rescue verb of some kind, but instead realizes an instance of v<sup>0</sup> that is linearized non-adjacent to the [[lexical]] verb." | ||
[[Category:ouvrages de recherche|Categories]] | [[Category:ouvrages de recherche|Categories]] | ||
Version du 21 juillet 2021 à 17:02
- Bjorkman, M. Bronwyn. 2011. BE-ing Default: the Morphosyntax of Auxiliaries, PhD thesis, MIT. texte.
Introduction au chapitre 4: "Chapter 4 investigates the use of do as a “support” auxiliary not only in English but in the mainland Scandinavian languages, the Northern Italian dialect Monnese, and Breton. The motivation for this investigation is the potential conflict between the analysis of be advanced in chapter 2 and traditional analyses of do-support: both involve the “last resort” insertion of a default verb in order to morphologically realize stranded inflectional information. I demonstrate that the typological profile of do-support is incompatible with its traditional analysis, and sketch an alternative analysis in which do is not inserted as a rescue verb of some kind, but instead realizes an instance of v0 that is linearized non-adjacent to the lexical verb."
