Différences entre les versions de « Discussion:Pronom objet direct après un infinitif »
De Arbres
(Page créée avec « I have always wondered what the source is. The IPA suggests Ternes, but I can't find it in there. However, in Ternes, [gurteɲ] is not only infinitive, but also the stem o... ») |
|||
| Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
I have always wondered what the source is. The IPA suggests Ternes, but I can't find it in there. However, in Ternes, [gurteɲ] is not only infinitive, but also the stem of the imperative as well, p. 283, and [gurteɲ-aj] would be the regular 'attends-les", cf. p. 184 [gurteɲ-maj] 'attends-moi'. | march 2021, Wade: | ||
I have always wondered what the source is [for those pronouns]. | |||
The IPA suggests Ternes, but I can't find it in there. However, in Ternes, [gurteɲ] is not only infinitive, but also the stem of the imperative as well, p. 283, and [gurteɲ-aj] would be the regular 'attends-les", cf. p. 184 [gurteɲ-maj] 'attends-moi'. | |||
--[[Utilisateur:Mjouitteau|MJ.]] ([[Discussion utilisateur:Mjouitteau|discussion]]) 26 mars 2021 à 17:44 (CET): Oui, Il faudrait consolider ce paradigme. | |||
Version actuelle datée du 26 mars 2021 à 18:44
march 2021, Wade: I have always wondered what the source is [for those pronouns]. The IPA suggests Ternes, but I can't find it in there. However, in Ternes, [gurteɲ] is not only infinitive, but also the stem of the imperative as well, p. 283, and [gurteɲ-aj] would be the regular 'attends-les", cf. p. 184 [gurteɲ-maj] 'attends-moi'.
--MJ. (discussion) 26 mars 2021 à 17:44 (CET): Oui, Il faudrait consolider ce paradigme.
