https://arbres.iker.cnrs.fr/index.php?title=Rouveret_(2017)&feed=atom&action=historyRouveret (2017) - Historique des versions2024-03-29T08:11:23ZHistorique des révisions pour cette page sur le wikiMediaWiki 1.37.1https://arbres.iker.cnrs.fr/index.php?title=Rouveret_(2017)&diff=93040&oldid=prevMjouitteau le 19 juillet 2020 à 10:112020-07-19T10:11:57Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="fr">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Version précédente</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Version du 19 juillet 2020 à 11:11</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3">Ligne 3 :</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Ligne 3 :</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> '''<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">abstract</del>''':</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> '''<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Abstract</ins>''':</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> What makes Celtic languages particularly attractive to both formal syntacticians and typologists is that they rigidly instantiate a particular linguistic type in Greenberg's classification, namely [[VSO]]. The various proposals discussed in this chapter have attempted to integrate this hallmark of Celtic syntax into the scope of syntactic theorizing. Recent analyses of Celtic clausal structure, based on the VP‐internal subject hypothesis, the split‐Infl proposal, and the cartographic approach to the [[left periphery]], represent a huge improvement over the previous accounts. Beside the verb–subject order, other dimensions must be taken into account for a proper characterization of the VSO phenomenology: [[agreement]] phenomena and the [[Complementarity Effect]]; the syntax of [[copular constructions]], which present significant differences across Celtic, but are never [[V1]]; the existence of [[V2]] structures in a V1 language, namely Breton. All these issues bear upon major theoretical questions, such as the nature of structure‐building processes, the status of head movement, the motivation for [[DP]]‐raising, the relation of syntax to morphology, the relevance of adjacency to morphological phenomena at [[PF]], the nature of microparametric and macroparametric variation, and the potential connection between [[V1]] and [[V2]]. </div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">"</ins>What makes Celtic languages particularly attractive to both formal syntacticians and typologists is that they rigidly instantiate a particular linguistic type in Greenberg's classification, namely [[VSO]]. The various proposals discussed in this chapter have attempted to integrate this hallmark of Celtic syntax into the scope of syntactic theorizing. Recent analyses of Celtic clausal structure, based on the VP‐internal subject hypothesis, the split‐Infl proposal, and the cartographic approach to the [[left periphery]], represent a huge improvement over the previous accounts. Beside the verb–subject order, other dimensions must be taken into account for a proper characterization of the VSO phenomenology: [[agreement]] phenomena and the [[Complementarity Effect]]; the syntax of [[copular constructions]], which present significant differences across Celtic, but are never [[V1]]; the existence of [[V2]] structures in a V1 language, namely Breton. All these issues bear upon major theoretical questions, such as the nature of structure‐building processes, the status of head movement, the motivation for [[DP]]‐raising, the relation of syntax to morphology, the relevance of adjacency to morphological phenomena at [[PF]], the nature of microparametric and macroparametric variation, and the potential connection between [[V1]] and [[V2]].<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">" </ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category:ouvrages de recherche|Categories]]</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category:ouvrages de recherche|Categories]]</div></td></tr>
</table>Mjouitteauhttps://arbres.iker.cnrs.fr/index.php?title=Rouveret_(2017)&diff=72881&oldid=prevMjouitteau : Page créée avec « * Rouveret, Alain. 2017. 'VSO Word Order in the Celtic Languages', Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (éds.), ''The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax'', Second Edi... »2018-05-21T16:03:13Z<p>Page créée avec « * Rouveret, Alain. 2017. 'VSO Word Order in the Celtic Languages', Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (éds.), ''The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax'', Second Edi... »</p>
<p><b>Nouvelle page</b></p><div>* Rouveret, Alain. 2017. 'VSO Word Order in the Celtic Languages', Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (éds.), ''The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax'', Second Edition, 1.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
'''abstract''':<br />
What makes Celtic languages particularly attractive to both formal syntacticians and typologists is that they rigidly instantiate a particular linguistic type in Greenberg's classification, namely [[VSO]]. The various proposals discussed in this chapter have attempted to integrate this hallmark of Celtic syntax into the scope of syntactic theorizing. Recent analyses of Celtic clausal structure, based on the VP‐internal subject hypothesis, the split‐Infl proposal, and the cartographic approach to the [[left periphery]], represent a huge improvement over the previous accounts. Beside the verb–subject order, other dimensions must be taken into account for a proper characterization of the VSO phenomenology: [[agreement]] phenomena and the [[Complementarity Effect]]; the syntax of [[copular constructions]], which present significant differences across Celtic, but are never [[V1]]; the existence of [[V2]] structures in a V1 language, namely Breton. All these issues bear upon major theoretical questions, such as the nature of structure‐building processes, the status of head movement, the motivation for [[DP]]‐raising, the relation of syntax to morphology, the relevance of adjacency to morphological phenomena at [[PF]], the nature of microparametric and macroparametric variation, and the potential connection between [[V1]] and [[V2]]. <br />
<br />
<br />
[[Category:ouvrages de recherche|Categories]]</div>Mjouitteau