Discussion:Duel : Différence entre versions

De Arbres
Aller à : Navigation, rechercher
(Page créée avec « For un daoulagad, also Favereau 1997 §97, Kergoat et al. 1989 (Yezhadur) p. 33 (and though only mentioned, Press 1986: 65); perhaps to be compared with _un_ + plural, Fav... »)
 
 
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
For un daoulagad, also Favereau 1997 §97, Kergoat et al. 1989 (Yezhadur) p. 33 (and though only mentioned, Press 1986: 65); perhaps to be compared with _un_ + plural, Favereau §36, Kergoat et al. p. 41, _ur geriennou bennak_ &c.
+
: M. Rezac: For ''un daoulagad'', also Favereau 1997 §97, Kergoat et al. 1989 (Yezhadur) p. 33 (and though only mentioned, Press 1986: 65); perhaps to be compared with ''un'' + plural, Favereau §36, Kergoat et al. p. 41, ''ur geriennou bennak'' &c. (Google does not seem to reveal other duals with ''un'' from solid sources: most are bad OCR for ''an daoulin'' &c, others are of uncertain provenance like Wikipedia articles).
  
(G does not seem to reveal other duals with _un_ from solid sources: most are bad OCR for _an daoulin_ &c, others are of uncertain provenance like Wikipedia articles).
+
:--[[Utilisateur:Mjouitteau|MJ.]] ([[Discussion utilisateur:Mjouitteau|discussion]]) 17 août 2016 à 10:29 (CEST): Merci. Je référence.

Version actuelle en date du 17 août 2016 à 09:29

M. Rezac: For un daoulagad, also Favereau 1997 §97, Kergoat et al. 1989 (Yezhadur) p. 33 (and though only mentioned, Press 1986: 65); perhaps to be compared with un + plural, Favereau §36, Kergoat et al. p. 41, ur geriennou bennak &c. (Google does not seem to reveal other duals with un from solid sources: most are bad OCR for an daoulin &c, others are of uncertain provenance like Wikipedia articles).
--MJ. (discussion) 17 août 2016 à 10:29 (CEST): Merci. Je référence.