(Kayne 2006:23)

De Arbres
Version du 2 septembre 2009 à 22:51 par Mjouitteau (discuter | contributions)

(diff) ← Version précédente | Voir la version courante (diff) | Version suivante → (diff)
Aller à : Navigation, rechercher

Kayne (2006 :23):

 Limitations on deictic ‘’there’’ as expletive’’’:
 
 In (my) colloqial Englsih, expletive ‘’there’’ occurs only with ‘’be’’. 
 Although the folloqing are possible in some register(s) of English, they are for me impossible in colloquial English.
 (140)   There exist solutions to all these problems.
 (141)   There have arrived several letters for you.
 In this respect, colloquial Eglsih is like both Italian and French, whose deictic expletive ’’ci’’ and ‘’y’’ are limited to 
 existencials with ‘’be’’ (in Italian) and ‘’have’’ (in French) and which do not occur int he counterparts of (140) and (141). 
 In contrast, as discussed by Burzio (1986, chap.2), Piedmontese expletive clitic ‘’ye’’ is found more widely, 
 occurring as it does with all unaccusatives. 
 
 Why Piedmontese should be freer in this regard tha Italian or French is not clear […]. 
 Nor is it clear why ‘’be’’ is singled out by Italian, French and colloqial English – 
 perhaps it is that ‘’be’’ is associated with less structure than any other verb 
 – or even that ‘’be’’ is not really a verb […]. 


references

Kayne, R. 2006. ‘Expletives, Datives, and the Tension between Morphology and Syntax’, ms. University of New York. Burzio, L. 1986. ‘’Italian Syntax. A Government-Binding Approach’’, Reidel, Dordrecht.